<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Freshly Brewed Ritwik &#187; Lifehacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ritwikroy.com/blog/category/lifehacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ritwikroy.com/blog</link>
	<description>The musings of an artistic engineer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bouncing back into action with bing</title>
		<link>http://ritwikroy.com/blog/78/bouncing-back-into-action-with-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://ritwikroy.com/blog/78/bouncing-back-into-action-with-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ritwik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifehacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritwikroy.com/blog/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I haven&#8217;t posted in a while, and before I left off, I wanted to discuss Bing vs Google, from my perspective. I ended up using Bing for over a month rather than 2 weeks as initially planned and this is a summary of what I found. For general searches (looking up websites, searching for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I haven&#8217;t posted in a while, and before I left off, I wanted to discuss Bing vs Google, from my perspective. I ended up using Bing for over a month rather than 2 weeks as initially planned and this is a summary of what I found.</p>
<p>For general searches (looking up websites, searching for names of places, etc) Bing did fine. I found what I needed and most of the time the site I was looking for was among the first few results, as the case tends to be with Google searches. For technical content however, I quite often found that what I was looking for wasn&#8217;t on the first page. Upon looking the same query on google, I&#8217;d find a much better results set, especially with niche topics, such as the Player-Stage robotics studio that I have been developing with. For such topics, Google far outshone Bing in my experience.</p>
<p>The one place Bing does great however, is images. Bing&#8217;s image search page uses ajax to allow you to keep scrolling down for more images, and they are loaded up as needed. This reduces the need to jump from page to page, as is the case with Google image search. Like Google searches, Bing has some filters that can be used to narrow your search down. It also has, -unlike- Google, some recommendations relevant to the type of search. For example, if you search for &#8220;Jay-Z&#8221; under images, it offers you a list of &#8220;related people&#8221; that is fairly accurate in the searches I performed. Whether this is actually useful to you or not largely depends on what you use image searches for.</p>
<p><span id="more-78"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_80" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://ritwikroy.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Jay-Z-related-people.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-80" title="Jay-Z related people" src="http://ritwikroy.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Jay-Z-related-people.png" alt="Bing related people" width="300" height="263" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bing&#39;s related people</p></div>
<p>When you click an image, Bing has a similar frame to google where it shows you the page, except that it keeps the scrollable list of images on the left side as thumbnails. So you can quickly select a different image if you want without needing to go back and forth as you tend to do with Google image searches. This was a huge timesaver for me.</p>
<p>Finally, there is the main search page. For Google, it is a simple search box that exemplifies minimalist design. In the other corner is Bing, which shows you a beautiful (in most cases) image in the background, with tags on the image showing interesting facts about it. In developing nations with bandwidth and latency issues, it will be much faster to load up the Google home page. However, for me, with an ADSL 2 connection, the difference is barely noticeable. In addition, I don&#8217;t often use the actual search homepage. I prefer to search from the location bar  /search box in whichever browser I&#8217;m using, and I&#8217;m sure there are many people in the same camp. Also, with the image tags, how many people sit there on the Bing homepage reading the info tags before searching? I&#8217;d be interested in seeing some statistics on that.</p>
<p>All in all, I&#8217;m going to stick to Google for general searches, since I mostly search technical content and it does well on the general stuff too. I will be using Bing search for images though, I find it much more suitable for that. Your results may vary, but I think everyone should at least give Bing a fair trial. You might find it to be a better browser for you.</p>
<p>On a side note, one browser specific quirk I noticed for firefox was that if I type a word into the location bar, say &#8220;facebook&#8221;, it would show me the Bing results for &#8220;facebook&#8221;, with the actual facebook page as the top result. Previously with google as my built in search engine, it would use the best result from google that it could find, thus sending me straight to the facebook homepage if I just typed &#8220;facebook&#8221; in the location bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ritwikroy.com/blog/78/bouncing-back-into-action-with-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession proof your career</title>
		<link>http://ritwikroy.com/blog/12/recession-proof-your-career/</link>
		<comments>http://ritwikroy.com/blog/12/recession-proof-your-career/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ritwik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifehacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job hunting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritwikr.com/blog/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently came across an interesting article on Ramit Sethi&#8217;s blog, &#8220;I will teach you to be rich&#8220;. It covered an ebook &#8211; Recession Proof Your Career &#8211; which had some interesting pointers on how to secure a graduate job doing what you enjoy even in the current job market. Head on to the article [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across an interesting article on Ramit Sethi&#8217;s blog, &#8220;<a title="I will teach you to be rich" href="http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/" target="_blank">I will teach you to be rich</a>&#8220;. It covered an ebook &#8211; Recession Proof Your Career &#8211; which had some interesting pointers on how to secure a graduate job doing what you enjoy even in the current job market.</p>
<p>Head on to the <a title="Recession proof your career" href="http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/new-free-ebook-recession-proof-your-career/" target="_blank">article</a> to read the book, its only 30 pages and I highly recommend going through it. The advice is definitely not your standard &#8220;Have a good resume&#8221; and &#8220;Send it to all the companies&#8221;. One section for example, starts with:</p>
<blockquote><p>Throw away your resume, you wonʼt need it anymore.</p></blockquote>
<p>Check it out, and while your at it, have a browse through the blog. There are some useful ways of saving money without giving up things you enjoy, like in my case, my daily coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ritwikroy.com/blog/12/recession-proof-your-career/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
